Google earth wont install on mac

Uninstall Google Earth Pro

Thanks, Fastman. I've got a Macbook Air and it's working fine on that machine. I dunno. I have issues as well, pc. Gave up. Squily , Aug 11, We've been having the same issues on Basecamp, as well as Mapsource. Keeps saying we have to install Google Earth - even when GE is open. Running different versions of Windows. And then every once-in-a-while, it works Squily, I got mine to work one time today and thought, "Got it!

All replies

Joined: Sep 18, Oddometer: 1, Location: Australia. I found those today when trying to fix this issue. I can't find anything about Macs. Got it working, again! I back up both Macbook and Macbook Air every Saturday. That killed the latest, greatest Google Earth and reinstalled v. GE now opens from Basecamp. A little update: Last night, my Google Earth v. I notice the GE icon in the dock had a question mark in the middle and, sure enough, the program was gone from both computers. I've no idea how long this will work but, for now, this versions works with BaseCamp.

Joined: Sep 21, Oddometer: 8, Location: alabama. I had the same problem with my mac. Google Earth is now named Google Earth Pro on the mac. It works fine now. Just went into the Libraries on both my Macs, found and deleted the Google Update folders. If not, why not? If so, what are his policies on these matters - for example, on following the guidance provided by operating system vendors, such as requests to sign code?

And if there is such guidance, does Google take any steps to ensure that it's followed? The primary use of an installer is to dump stuff somewhere you need elevated privileges to write. Your home folder is not one of those places, so why annoy users with an installer? You've never done this before, have you? When I upgraded to 5. Have they changed this? Otherwise I don't see what all the controversy is about. If you don't want it you can still install 4. It doesn't appear in a Localizable.

go to link

Install & uninstall Google Earth Pro - Google Earth Help

I'm not sure what your point is here? For the paranoid: Check your Google apps and see who is the owner. I'm pretty sure that SketchUp 6 installed as root. Changed it back to me and it still worked. I think you're a bit confused. It's not setuid. Also sure Rotating Strawberry Madonnas is a little silly, it looks like it comes from a book, nothing wrong with that. Now if there was something in the file like "I like boobies1!

Or maybe you're one of those people who stalks programmers online and complains why that person isn't working on the program instead of doing something else at 2am on a sunday? Your Beavis and Butthead programmers may also be wryly witty linguistics students. I only use Earth. It's the only Google app I use. It's owned by me. I'm not paranoid. So I have no problem. Frankly I think all y'all are just crazy. The HIG. Use of the standard Apple installer package style. Frankly, I think Earth should be a plain old drag and drop install. It is now, but it asks you to install something else when you run it and gives you no way to not install it.

I don't want nor need an updater. Use Sparkle if you have to. Sparkle rocks. Every app should use this framework. It makes updating so damn easy. Two clicks. It pains me that some apps either take you to a website to download a DMG manually, or download the DMG for you buy tell you to install it yourself. Sparkle, I praise you. Now if only everyone used it. What's so different to Sparkle? Not all apps are bundle based. Sparkle-like checking at launch isn't the best user experience if you think about it.

You get prompted to quit the app at the one time you want to run it?

Install Google Earth Pro

You don't get security updates while the app is running? You don't get a fix that resolves a quit-on-launch problem? Google Updater seems to quite closely follow Apple's own lead with Software Update. But you can turn Apple Software update off, correct? Can you turn off Google Updater? I don't mean to be a jerk, but don't you think you might be a little bit biased? Do you get the problem yet? Google doesn't give you the option to turn it off, and you can't fucking delete the app. Come up, Google can screw up, too, and in this case did. I don't see it as reason for the Amber alert going on here for sure, but still.

Google has enough brains to come up with an in-app updater similar to Sparkle that the user can control. Or do you think Google is incapable of that? The fact that you have to bend so much should at least cause some red lights to flash.

Use this virtual globe app to browse the world from your desktop

ITT we yell at Google for pretending to be perfect. One of these days I'll find a reason to use something other than search and gmail which is to say, search and search. I'm sure of it. I think that's a really bad rationale. I hope that's not what Google's thinking. I like and use Google Earth myself, and as a user I'd be a little unhappy if I thought that really did explain why they've done what they did. I've no objection to not "annoying" users - by which I guess you mean not requiring an extra click or two.

At least, I've no objection if that doesn't conflict with doing what's best. So does it or not?

  • how to run swf file on mac.
  • evoluent verticalmouse 4 right mac.
  • how to play trouble in terrorist town mac?
  • how to take a screenshot on a mac pro laptop;
  • Google Earth Install | Apple iOS MacOS Help | Fix Mac iPhone iPad | Buying Tips | Mac-Forums.
  • Google Earth Pro Is Now Available For Free.
  • Install Google Earth Pro on Mac OSX?

It seems to me that's the question. What I'd hope is that Google would follow industry best practices and Apple's guidelines whether or not it meant an extra click or two for the user. So has the OP got a point or not? Could the Google Updater, being in a user writable place, be modified or replaced easily? What's the possible consequences if it is? The attacker would have to execute a remote exploit that specifically targets Google Earth 5. While possible, I'd suspect it might be quite rare Well, whenever someone releases some software that uses an installer there's always a ton of whining about that, so there is an incentive to not use one unless absolutely necessary.

Personally I think the Google Updater is a massive case of NIH, especially when it comes to ordinary applications like Google Earth and the whole thing could be done a lot better, but there is nothing that warrants this hysteria. I get what you're saying.

Install & uninstall Google Earth Pro

I can see how that might affect people's decisions. I wonder whether it should. Not Invented Here. So they could have used an existing solution? I wonder. People have talked about Sparkle, but I can see Google might think embedding that in every app separately is inefficient.

Yeah, I know.

How To download Google Earth free for Mac - The How-To Expert

Everyone's nervous of Google. I don't like MS - and personally, I'd give Google a lot of leeway on that basis - but not carte blanche. I'm curious about "could be done better". I grant you the risks are low. But do you think Google is taking a calculated risk with people's' machines? That might be a low risk - even a very low risk - but is it there? And are they doing that for no other or better reason than that people might whine about an installer?

Disclaimer: Yes, I work for Google. I don't work in the teams that produce these products, and I'm only speaking for myself, not in any official capacity, even if I had one. I'm sure I'm biased. That's why I've tried to restrict my posts in this thread to pointing out inaccuracies and providing background information without getting too much into it. I have no real interest in evangelizing. It's not my job, and I don't want to do it. It's hardly uncommon for software companies that provide suites of software and multiple products to have a common updater, ie Adobe and Microsoft. Thank you for the kind words, and I'm sorry you feel that way about my participation in this thread.

Looking back however, I am mystified you feel that I'm bending over backwards. My posts have consisted of: Pointing out that freaking over the unique nonsense string in the binary is ridiculous, particularly given the string describes what it is there for. Posting a link for people to provide bug reports for Google Earth.

Pointing out that freaking out over an application bundle being owned by root is ridiculous. Asking what the standard OS guidelines are for providing an out of band updater that is intended to update multiple applications and has to deal with non-bundle apps. Providing a link to a discussion about why Google didn't use Sparkle that includes feedback from the developer of Sparkle. If I was mounting a defence of the whole situation, my posts would have been quite different. I'm sorry you're seeing my posts in this light. All reasonable comments, very good and fair posts.

  • Recommended Posts!
  • Google Earth Pro.
  • mail merge word 2013 mac.

The link was interesting: quote: We built Update Engine to do a few things that Sparkle doesn't do or at least didn't do at the time we designed Update Engine. We needed something that could update non-bundle-based apps in addition to regular Cocoa apps Google Earth has some Qt stuff, right? So it's not a "regular Cocoa app". And even if were, other Google apps might not be. They have to have a solution that works for everything. What about the complaint that the Google updater would be easy to write to, hence alter or replace - and in that way is not analogous to Apple Software Update?

It's a LaunchAgent in your home directory that triggers this. If malware wanted to set up some kind of execution vector, they could modify the target of that LaunchAgent in any number of ways, or indeed create their own. Unless you're talking about something setuid, a user LaunchAgent runs in your login context, it's not like it is magically getting root privileges. I shouldn't have to launch Lingon to disable it. At least it appears that Google Earth doesn't re-load the Launch Daemon if it's disabled. Some people like to update their software the old-fashioned way - when they remember to.

Even Apple's utility has that ability - and when Apple is offering more options than you, you know it's time to change. I disabled the Google keystone daemon and agents with Lingon. This should be sufficient to prevent these auto-updates, no? You'll notice I haven't defended that behavior. Personally I agree with having the updater work the way it does, but do think it should able to be disabled more easily even if it isn't the default. This is pretty much the only valid point I think anyone has made against the updater in this thread.

Code signing is a good idea in theory, but it hasn't exactly been a huge hit amongst third party developers so far. IF I wanted Opera I'd download it. There is NO reason to have it installed that I'm aware of - correct me if I'm wrong. I think Adobe uses it as a torrent client for updates or something ridiculous like that?

I don't know. I can't think of any situation where it would be better than a script. It's pretty retarded. I have no idea if this is true or not. I've also been told that it uses Opera's rendering engine for, well, something. Maybe help. I have no support for this either. I always assumed that they used it for whatever they used it for because it is cross-platform and available with a suitable license.

I suppose you could just delete it and see what stops working. Thanks, Dave. I'd forgot to check this thread. I quite follow that it's not such a big deal if the binary isn't setuid root. Nice statement of that here: quote: An application that can be changed by someone who isn't trustworthy is an untrustworthy application.

Not because of what it does, but because of what it could be changed to do. For example, someone could replace images or text in the application, misleading a user about what it's doing, or causing a user to do something unintended. Or depending on how your machine is set up, "someone" could be a remote program or person connecting to your computer from anywhere on the network or the internet. Considering the number of malicious people and programs out there, that could be a very bad thing indeed. It's even more important for certain kinds of applications to remain trustworthy: the ones that execute as root.

google earth wont install on mac Google earth wont install on mac
google earth wont install on mac Google earth wont install on mac
google earth wont install on mac Google earth wont install on mac
google earth wont install on mac Google earth wont install on mac
google earth wont install on mac Google earth wont install on mac
google earth wont install on mac Google earth wont install on mac
google earth wont install on mac Google earth wont install on mac

Related google earth wont install on mac

Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved